So, I don't usually talk about politics with people unless I know that they are comfortable with it. I think it's rude to do otherwise, really. I don't want to force my views on other people, and I can still be friends and have great respect for people who have different political and religious views than me. I hope that people I consider "friends" will extend the same courtesy to me.
That being said,
"Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.
In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.
We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant."
"The Paradox of Tolerance," Karl Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies
That being said,
"Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them.
In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols.
We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant."
"The Paradox of Tolerance," Karl Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-12 09:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-12 09:30 pm (UTC)Thank you for that. ^^
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-12 11:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-13 03:19 am (UTC)Thank you.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-13 08:17 am (UTC)I hope I get to read it soon. Thanks for quoting it!
(no subject)
Date: 2006-09-13 01:36 pm (UTC)